QUESTION! SHOULD AUGUSTA ROMAN GET CUSTODY OF HER EMBRYOS

Augusta's picure above



Her ex husband Randy!

A custody battle is brewing between Augusta Roman and her ex husband for custody of her frozen fertilized embryos. Her ex-husband does not want her to have the babies and Augusta who is originally from Nigeria and who is 47 years old feels this is her last chance to have kids!

In the divorce she got the house, now the question of the right to have the embryos has been taken to the US Supreme court. This could set a precedence, what are your thoughts everyone? Should she get custody?

According to the LATIMES "Augusta wanted to take possession and have them implanted, agreeing to release Randy from any financial or parental obligation. Randy wanted the embryos destroyed, or at least frozen indefinitely. He argued that even though he did not want to raise children with Augusta, he would never disavow his genetic offspring. As he would point out in court, the couple had initialed a cryopreservation consent form stipulating that should they divorce, any frozen embryos "shall be discarded."

Roman vs. Roman now rests with the Supreme Court of Texas, one of a number of divorce cases nationwide in which the custody dispute has revolved around microscopic clumps of cells that are considered — by most states, at least — to be property and not human life.
A former bodybuilder, Augusta met her future husband at a local gym in 1996. Randy Roman was an aerospace technician who had moved to Texas from Northern California. Both were in their mid-30s and ready to settle down. They shared a desire to start a family and a common Christian faith — or thought they did.

They married after a brief courtship, and Augusta acceded to her husband's suggestion that they wait two years before trying to have children. They bought a house that came ready-made with a girl's room papered in pink and a boy's room decorated with animal prints. When they did start trying, she got pregnant quickly, but miscarried 10 weeks later. After an additional six months of fruitless attempts, doctors determined that Augusta had a fertility problem, and she began round after round of treatments.

On the night before the scheduled embryo transfer, the couple went out for Chinese food. Upon returning home, Augusta changed into her nightgown and settled in to watch the news. That is when Randy told her they needed to talk, and presented her with a handwritten bill of complaints. Foremost was his claim that he perceived her as being "hostile to God."

These are my kids," Augusta said. "It's almost like I was pregnant and somebody says I have to give them up because he doesn't want to be a father, so get an abortion because he's changed his mind."

Randy counters that Augusta's position would reduce the legal standing of men in in vitro fertilization cases to that of mere sperm donors. "If I am the biological father of a child, I could not bear the emotional consequences of being forced out of my child's life by a court order," he testified.

He questions why Augusta has been so persistent, given her low odds of getting pregnant even if she wins."

Is it me or does the husband seem mean? She was already in her mid 30's when they got married! Yet he wanted her to wait two years? What do you say readers?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Na wa o. Dis one baffles me o. Do u know a similar case like dis happened here in d UK. A british couple who were married for a number of years tried having a baby, all to no avail. D husband had his sperm frozen. But when d marriage ended, d husband wanted his sperm destroyed. Dis case went into court for about 4 yrs or so, they even took d case to d european courts. I think it was earlier on dis year or last year dat d court decided dat d sperm should be destroyed. It really saddened dat woman.
Honestly, i don't understand why matured adults should be fighting over c'mon 'human egg'. Sebi d woman na naija, if she's really into her christian faith, then she should believe dat everything's possible and she can try other means or just wait on God and He'll bless her just like He did with Sarah.
Bubbles said…
I don't the guy is being mean. Maybe like he said he can't just simply ignore the fact that he has a child. It's sad that the woman is 47 and is probably no longer producing eggs, if not she could have gotten a sperm donor or something.

Besides, there are millions of lovely children all over the world crying to belong to a family. Adoption is always an option, if she wants kids that bad.
Anonymous said…
i saw this on fox news i think...men....this is a tough one..cos the guy doesnt want kids...though the woman has said that he doesnt have to be there and help financially..but what about the kids..wont they need their father..and d guy has said he wont be able to ignore his bilogical child!...i seriously think the guy is beign mean ..but if he is not beign mean you cantt force him to be a father...but then he made er waste all her eggs with him..mehn i dont know o
Anonymous said…
She is wasting her time with this law suit. She needs to find a sperm bank and start the process over with an anonymous donor.
Anonymous said…
Only in developed countries do we see such nonsense. So he wants the thing destroyed abi? well is all good, she should take heart and let it go. White people and their wahala, i don't think she needs that anymore. Now is the time for her to sit back and make corrections or adopt. Nowadays, people prefer adopting anyway.

I wish the best in this battle, but has a woman is it worth it. If she needs a child why not get it somewhere else instead of with a man who clearly doesn't want it.

Goodluck to her.

Popular posts from this blog

GHANA'S FILM RISING STARS WATCHOUT NOLLYWOOD.

VAN VICKER IS TAKEN LADIES!